//Global var names = ['zero', 'one', 'two', 'three', 'four', 'five', 'six', 'seven', 'eight', 'nine']; var digit_name = function (n) { return names[n]; }; alert(digit_name(3)); // 'three' //Problem: not safe. It is global variable, other code could change it //Slow var digit_name = function (n) { var names = ['zero', 'one', 'two', 'three', 'four', 'five', 'six', 'seven', 'eight', 'nine']; return names[n]; }; alert(digit_name(3)); // 'three' //Problem: Safe but slow. Names hide in function scope, but need to initialize every time //Closure var digit_name = (function () { var names = ['zero', 'one', 'two', 'three', 'four', 'five', 'six', 'seven', 'eight', 'nine']; return function (n) { return names[n]; }; }()); alert(digit_name(3)); // 'three //Safe and fast
But why closure version code is faster?
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6614572/javascript-performance-with-closure
No comments:
Post a Comment